fix: hide exact quota values from account response (#16)
Closes #1 - hide exact quota values from GET /api/account - keep only the approximate quota bucket in the public account payload - add a regression test for the public account response contract - document that completed tasks should end with a PR Co-authored-by: sirily <sirily@git.shararam.party> Reviewed-on: #16
This commit was merged in pull request #16.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -8,12 +8,15 @@
|
||||
## Standard Flow
|
||||
1. Update local `master`.
|
||||
2. Create a task branch from `master`.
|
||||
3. Implement the change in that branch.
|
||||
4. Run the relevant verification for the change.
|
||||
5. Commit the work in that branch.
|
||||
6. Push the branch to Gitea.
|
||||
7. Open a merge request into `master`.
|
||||
8. Merge only after review or explicit approval.
|
||||
3. Pick or confirm the target issue in Gitea before implementation.
|
||||
4. Implement the change in that branch.
|
||||
5. Run the relevant verification for the change.
|
||||
6. Commit the work in that branch.
|
||||
7. Push the branch to Gitea.
|
||||
8. Open a merge request into `master`.
|
||||
9. Link the merge request to the issue in the MR body using `Closes #<issue-number>` or `Refs #<issue-number>`.
|
||||
10. If the Gitea UI does not show the link clearly, add an explicit comment in the issue with the MR number and URL.
|
||||
11. Merge only after review or explicit approval.
|
||||
|
||||
## Branch Naming
|
||||
Use short, purpose-driven names, for example:
|
||||
@@ -31,3 +34,4 @@ Use short, purpose-driven names, for example:
|
||||
## Agent Workflow
|
||||
- Codex or any other coding agent must create and use a dedicated branch per task.
|
||||
- After task completion, the agent should push that branch and prepare it for a merge request instead of pushing directly to `master`.
|
||||
- The agent must ensure the issue is explicitly linked to the merge request before handing off for merge.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user